The recent news that former pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli must hand over his copies of The Wu-Tang Clan’s Once Upon a Time in Shaolin album has stirred up controversy in the music and legal worlds. The preliminary injunction issued by federal Judge Pamela Chen in response to a lawsuit filed by NFT collective PleasrDAO, the current owner of Shaolin, accuses Shkreli of retaining data and files from the album without authorization. The group claims that Shkreli’s actions violate a court order to forfeit the album to the US government.
According to the hearing minutes published on sites like CourtListener, Judge Chen’s preliminary injunction against Shkreli includes several key provisions. Shkreli is prohibited from possessing, using, disseminating, or selling any interests in the Album, including its data and files. He must provide an inventory and accounting of the copies of the album he still retains as well as disclose who he distributed the data and files to, along with any revenue associated with these actions. Shkreli is also required to surrender all recordings of the album’s contents that he controls to his legal counsel.
To ensure compliance with the court order, specific deadlines have been set for Shkreli. By August 30, 2024, he must submit an affidavit confirming that he has surrendered all copies of the album and its contents to his defense counsel. Additionally, his counsel must confirm possession of the copies. By September 30, 2024, Shkreli is obligated to file an accounting affidavit identifying all known copies of the album or its contents, detailing distribution, and disclosing any financial benefits derived from such actions.
Prior to the recent injunction, Judge Chen had already issued a restraining order against Shkreli in June. The order prohibited him from further distributing the album and required his appearance in court to justify why he should not be compelled to relinquish all his copies of the album.
The ongoing legal battle surrounding The Wu-Tang Clan’s Once Upon a Time in Shaolin album underscores the complex intersection of music ownership, intellectual property rights, and legal accountability. Shkreli’s alleged retention and distribution of unauthorized copies of the album raise questions about the limits of ownership in the digital age and the consequences of violating court orders. The involvement of an NFT collective as the current owner of the album adds another layer of complexity to the case.
The controversy surrounding the Once Upon a Time in Shaolin album serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and complying with legal obligations. As the legal proceedings unfold and deadlines approach, the music industry and legal observers will be closely monitoring the case for its potential impact on future disputes involving exclusive music releases and ownership rights.
Leave a Reply